Quoting Thomas Goirand (2019-12-17 22:24:56) > On 12/15/19 10:21 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2019-12-15 21:02:19) > >> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:25:47PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >>> As others in this thread have pointed out, Debian explicitly omits > >>> classifying license fulltexts as "free software" or "non-free > >>> software". > >> Where does it explicitly do that? > >> We do that implicitly. > > > > Yes you are right. Thanks for correcting me. > > > > - Jonas > > If we are already shipping the license (non-free) text as part of > packages, what difference would it make to have them all shipped in a > single package? Can't the exception also apply to that one package > Jonas is suggesting? > > After reading all of this thread, I'm still not convince as to why it > should be forbidden.
As I read it, only Francesco says in this thread that license fulltexts should be (or already are) forbidden. In case that matters to your concerns. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
