On 12/14/19 1:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > A rich collection of Free license fulltexts is relevant, not only for > our users to pick from (even on a lonely island) and copy into new > development project, but also as reference e.g. for testing license > checkers. > > What is _not_ helpful in my opinion, however, is yet another manually > curated selection of random license texts. What I see generally useful > is to package this: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML
That looks like a great list to package. I'll need input on the repository license status from the legal team as it could be ambiguous from what I read in issues: [Add top level license to license list code and files][1] and [Clarify under which license the license list itself is licensed][2]. > If you are interested in license checkers, then please consider joining > others with same interest at the irc channel #licenses on OFTC.net. > > Related is also https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools Thanks for the pointers. Although my particular use case stops to new projects, it could certainly be expended to benefit license checkers. [1]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/683 [2]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/648 -- Baptiste BEAUPLAT - lyknode
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
