On 13.09.19 17:55, Russ Allbery wrote: > There seems to be an obvious ordering issue here, namely that it's very > weird to insist on the first (which has been the topic of this thread) > before we insist on the second.
I wouldn't see it as an ordering issue - my POV is that each of these issues is independend. Maybe it is just wishful thinking - but it would not really matter, in which direction these issues would be addressed. If i should setup a priority list it would be: 1) all packaging sources must be hosted in debian infrastructure (no matter in which way) 2) all packages should use a SCM (no matter what) 3) finally (maybe) consider git as the only supported SCM Each of these three points is controversial - i know. But it would be a nice goal. Cheers Alf
