Hi Sam, On 2019-05-23 15:33, Sam Hartman wrote: > I don't think that's entirely true.
Yes, that's a bit cruel to upstream. > Reproducibility is still an issue, but is no more or less an issue than > with any other software. Bit-by-bit reproducibility is not quite practical for now. The refined definition of "Numerically Reproducible" is much better and I use it as the default definition. https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/deeplearning-policy#neural-network-reproducibility > Consider how we treat assets for games or web applications. And yes > there are some confusing areas there and areas where we'd like to > improve. But let's be consistent in what we demand from various > communities to be part of Debian. Let's not penalize people for being > new and innovative. Agreed.
