Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Nix and non-standard-toplevel-dir"):
> I think this is a case where we should waive FHS for this package, due to
> the unique nature of this package.I agree for the reasons Russ gives. > I don't think it's worth writing an explicit Policy exception for this, > since it's a single edge case. Instead, I think it's a good use of a > Lintian override documenting what's going on. Obviously, if Nix becomes > really popular in the long run, we can then go back and write this into > Policy. This is a good approach. Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
