Including the soname is for the binary package, not the source. This should be:
Source: libpe Binary: libpe1 Scott K On March 17, 2018 5:35:51 PM UTC, Robert Haist <rha...@mailbox.org> wrote: >Hi Scott, > >I just had a look at similar packages and also the debian maint-guide >best practice: > >https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/advanced.en.html > >Regards, > >Robert Haist >---------------- >2BC8 3F55 A400 7468 864C 680E 1B7C C8D4 D4E9 14AA > > >> Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> hat am 16. März 2018 um 00:13 >geschrieben: >> >> >> On Thursday, March 15, 2018 11:51:11 PM Robert Haist wrote: >> > Package: wnpp >> > Severity: wishlist >> > Owner: Robert Haist <rha...@mailbox.org> >> > >> > * Package name : libpe1 >> > Version : 1.0.0 >> > Upstream Author : Fernando Mercês >> > * URL : https://github.com/merces/libpe >> > * License : LGPLv3 >> > Programming Lang: C >> > Description : The PE library used by pev >> > >> > Currently the pev package in debian contains the pev tools and the >library, >> > because upstream had a single integrated repo in the past. Now >upstream is >> > divided in two repos and we have to package the library as >dependency too. >> >> Is there a reason you picked libpe1 instead of libpe? Generally >encoding the >> soname in the source package name is not a good practice. >> >> Scott K
