Hi Scott, I just had a look at similar packages and also the debian maint-guide best practice:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/advanced.en.html Regards, Robert Haist ---------------- 2BC8 3F55 A400 7468 864C 680E 1B7C C8D4 D4E9 14AA > Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> hat am 16. März 2018 um 00:13 > geschrieben: > > > On Thursday, March 15, 2018 11:51:11 PM Robert Haist wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Robert Haist <rha...@mailbox.org> > > > > * Package name : libpe1 > > Version : 1.0.0 > > Upstream Author : Fernando Mercês > > * URL : https://github.com/merces/libpe > > * License : LGPLv3 > > Programming Lang: C > > Description : The PE library used by pev > > > > Currently the pev package in debian contains the pev tools and the library, > > because upstream had a single integrated repo in the past. Now upstream is > > divided in two repos and we have to package the library as dependency too. > > Is there a reason you picked libpe1 instead of libpe? Generally encoding the > soname in the source package name is not a good practice. > > Scott K
