m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Dec 31, Simon Richter <s...@debian.org> wrote:
>> These are running stretch, and I would like to upgrade them without >> breaking my existing scripts, which assume sysvinit with runlevels >> (including one-shot runlevels). > Somebody having legacy scripts which assume sysvinit and that they do > not want to change does not make "sysvinit preferred over systemd" as it > is being argued. It does, however, mean that it's a good idea for us to continue to support sysvinit. We have a workable compromise at the moment, and it doesn't seem to be causing huge amounts of pain. As long as that continues, I plan on continuing to ship init scripts in my packages, although I'm not going to go to a ton of work to add new and exciting features to them. (But patches welcome.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
