Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> writes: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:34:05AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> For the discoverability, I would be quite comfortable with putting both >> the free and the non-free download links prominantly on the page with >> the non-free link going to or closely tied with a page that discusses >> the issues, explains why we have this installer even though we don't >> really want to, and maybe links to the FSF Respects Your Freedom pages >> to suggest a hardware alternative. > There are alternatives? There are a few vendors who produce hardware with free firmware and try to get rid of as much non-free code as possible. The actual processors for Intel-class systems still have issues, but it's a lot closer, and some of those systems are ARM. https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/endorsement/respects-your-freedom (Warning: The FSF is doing a membership drive with annoying pop-up Javascript right now, for those who don't have Javascript disabled.) -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
