Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> writes: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:51:16AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > Policy is not the Social Contract, Policy is not the Constitution. > > Policy can be relatively easily changed and is supposed to largely > > document actual practices. So really, Policy needs to be amended. > > And attempting to language-lawyer Policy like this is pointless. > I don't it *needs* to be amended as there is no data that the current > policy language cause problems.
Yes, I'm in agreement that the Policy wording has not been demonstrated to cause the alleged problems. I'm also in agreement with Anthony that, *if* the Policy wording is in conflict with agreed consensus practice, in that hypothetical scenario that would mean it is Policy that need to change. -- \ “A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. | `\ Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in | _o__) principle is always a vice.” —Thomas Paine | Ben Finney
