Hi, On Sun Aug 20, 2017 at 21:54:12 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > >> It'd be nice if, after all this discussion, you stated clearly whether > >> you plan to change something or not. > > > > Isn't that what I just did? > > No, not exactly. You stated what you want to do in *Buster*, but not > whether it's supposed to stay broken all the way until then. I guess > this email of yours does make it clear, though. > > I guess we should then move the discussion from "should libssl support > TLS 1.0/1.1" to "how do we get a system again that works with the > not-so-up-to-date rest of the world". > > At least I think our social contract demands we offer a *working*" ssl > setup: > ... > We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software > community. We will place their interests first in our priorities. We > will support the needs of our users for operation in many different > kinds of computing environments. > ...
+1 -- Martin Zobel-Helas <zo...@debian.org> Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
