On viernes, 4 de agosto de 2017 19:31:36 -03 intrigeri wrote: > Hi! > > tl;dr: I hereby propose we enable AppArmor by default in testing/sid, > and decide one year later if we want to keep it this way in the > Buster release. > > My goals when initiating this discussion are: > > - Get a rough idea of what amount of effort the Debian project is > happy (and able) to invest into such proactive security measures. > > - Learn about any relevant social & technical concerns I am not > aware of. > > I don't expect we'll make a decision based on this very proposal: > I expect the proposal will need to be refined, or abandoned, to take > into account what we will learn during this preliminary discussion.
From the way you redacted this you made me want to try apparmor. That's already a big compliment :-) For what I read in the proposal and in the thread I do believe we need to at least try this for a year. So my +1 for going ahead. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
