I have Ubuntu running on another box. I haven't had any trouble (to my knowledge) that has been caused from apparmor. Ubuntu being perceived as an entry OS for linux, I would think Canonical wouldn't have included it if it would introduce pain to desktop users. What sort of "pain" might apparmor cause?
I assumed apparmor was also on debian. If it isn't, doesn't this make Ubuntu significantly more secure than a debian installation? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Bicha" <jbi...@ubuntu.com> To: "Ritesh Raj Sarraf" <r...@debian.org> Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 9:11:32 AM Subject: Re: Let's enable AppArmor by default (why not?) On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <r...@debian.org> wrote: > But for desktop users, I worry this would cause more pain. My point is that it hasn't so far and Ubuntu and SUSE has had millions of people using it for a decade, more or less. Thanks, Jeremy Bicha
