On 2016-11-29 13:08:54, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2016-11-28 23:07, Iustin Pop wrote: > > On 2016-11-27 20:42:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > * The bug should be of severity "important" or higher > > > > Quick question: assuming all the other conditions are met (minimal > > patch, > > clean debdiff, etc.), this seems to discourage normal bugs fixing. Is > > that intentional (i.e. there must be significant breakage), or more > > about "we don't want random bugs fixed"? > > Further to Julien's answer, it's also worth noting that until a few years > ago the bar was in fact higher - essentially requiring the bug to be RC.
Ack. Thanks both for the answer! iustin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
