On Thursday, October 20, 2016 04:06:10 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Ondřej Surý (2016-10-20 15:48:08) > > > to stop you from bickering on and on, the build script can be > > reconstructed just from reading gulpfile.js and would consist of > > > installing ruby-sass, coffeescript and node-uglify and running: > Fine. > > Now, to get back to the original dispute whether serious or not: > > *Not* doing above (which in some cases, as you just proved, is simple) > but instead relying on upstream doing it for us using tools not in > Debian, is a serious bug in the packaging. > > Just as a typo in an argument to ./configure can cause FTBFS which is a > serious issue. > > Severity of bugs is ortogonal to how difficult they are to fix.
Since you're claiming 'serious', which policy shall requires it? Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
