Hi Samuel, On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:47:43AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > As a late follow-up of the gpg key collision thread from debian-private > (but posted on debian-devel, there is nothing private here, I prefer to > see this information publicized actually): > > € gpg --search-key samuel.thiba...@gnu.org > ... > (1) Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> > 4096 bit RSA key 7D069EE6, created: 2014-06-16 > (2) Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> > 4096 bit RSA key 7D069EE6, created: 2010-09-14 > > So somebody *does* try to fake my gpg key too... > > For the reminder, > https://gwolf.org/node/4070
I'm somewhat surprised by this mail… or rather by you appearantly knowing about the issue but still you seem to not have acted as advised, so let me repeat: everybody, please put "keyid-format long" into your ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf! then, the output will look like this: $ grep keyid-format .gnupg/gpg.conf keyid-format long $ gpg --search-key samuel.thiba...@gnu.org ... (1) Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> 4096 bit RSA key E2992EA47D069EE6, created: 2014-06-16 (2) Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@inria.fr> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@labri.fr> Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org> 4096 bit RSA key D0178C767D069EE6, created: 2010-09-14 voila. -- cheers, Holger, puzzled to still see people using short-ids, especially people who seem to be aware of the problem…
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature