On 2016-08-01 16:43:27 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > This seems reasonable. I think NM is a better choice than ifupdown for > roaming client devices (e.g. laptops), and systemd-networkd is a good > choice for "infrastructure" devices like servers and NAS boxes.
I don't have any problem with ifupdown on my laptops, where I can use different configurations via virtual interfaces, depending on the place I go (this is necessary due to broken modem-routers). And for wifi, I want a GUI, so that I use wicd. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
