On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, this is a question mainly for ftpmasters, but I think some public > discussion here > might be beneficial for me :)
I didn't see a question in your mail :) > Basically, we thought OpenWatcom license wasn't DFSG for Debain standards, > and now since > I would like to put Virtualbox back in main, I'm trying to see if some > statement > clarifying the license is sufficient to make it dfsg. Is there any reason they can't relicense to something more standard? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
