Hi, this is a question mainly for ftpmasters, but I think some public discussion here might be beneficial for me :)
Basically, we thought OpenWatcom license wasn't DFSG for Debain standards, and now since I would like to put Virtualbox back in main, I'm trying to see if some statement clarifying the license is sufficient to make it dfsg. I'm adding some pointers to the RFP bug, and to the public discussion that is ongoing upstream. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=376431 https://github.com/open-watcom/open-watcom-v2/issues/271 thanks for reading :) Gianfranco
