On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, gustavo panizzo <gfa> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Alexandre Viau wrote: > > > > > On 28/07/16 02:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > At this point, I'm dropping work on gitlab for debian and moving to less > > > > controversial alternative pagure. > > > > > > Pagure looks great and I am happy to see that we are finally moving > > > towards something that (more) people agree with. > > > > > > Thank you for your efforts, I am impressed that you still want to work > > > on this project even if we are not going to use Gitlab. > > > > > > Once again, I would like to mention that I want to help this move > > > forward as I consider it very important. > > > > > > Is there a list of things that have to be done where I can give a hand? > > I also looked into pagure and I see two problems: it is not packaged and it > > depends on fedmsg for usermanagement (it also supports PAM, but this is > > usually not something I really like.. Both tasks should get solved somehow. > why not PAM? PAM could totally have a different config than login/ssh, > we could allow LDAP, PGSQL, whatever for this particular PAM service. > While SSH continues to use /etc/shadow, as an example. I would prefer not have system users (I know thats possible with PAM, but it is imho pita)
alex
