On Jul 08, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote: > And of those two choices, I would lean heavily towards ext4. I have seen > repeated file system corruptions, kernel panics, and file systems that get > extremely slow after heavy usage for multiple months under XFS, and have > not seen any of those problems with ext4. I mostly agreed with this, but then Red Hat switched to XFS as their default and I consider this a significant endorsement. Nowadays I tend to use XFS for the larger (> 500 GB) file systems.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
