On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:55 PM, <german...@ya.ru> wrote: > I value stability of a FS over other considerations like shiny new features > and performance. I know that Debian Stable includes only that versions of > software that were considered rock-solid and mostly bug-free. But on the > other hand I read documentation for version of a Linux kernel of Debian > Stable and it says that btrfs is under heavy development and isn't suitable > for any uses other than benchmarking and review. Proof-link: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/Documentation/filesystems/btrfs.txt?id=refs/tags/v3.16.36
Believe the upstream. While in the nearest kernel, there is no sentence about "under heavy development". Installer is just installer. > > > I'm really confused, I don't know whom to believe. > -- YunQiang Su
