On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 00:35 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > I was discussing this yeasterday with Paul. > While the current package has some issues I believe that it is already > quite useful as is, so if the alternative is to remove it from the > archive then I am going to adopt it.
It would be great if you could join pkg-clamav and adopt it, as I'm not particularly interested at this point in time. Personally I am still waiting for clamav freshclam to properly support third-party signatures, so clamav-unofficial-sigs can be a config file. > I have some doubts about the quality of this fork, so I plan to > investigate in detail what has changed before blindly adopting it. I was also unimpressed when I looked at the fork, resulting in me putting it further down my TODO pile. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
