As explained elsewhere in this thread, using initramfs is still not mandatory in debian and I personally have more managed debian system installed without it than with it.Remember that / and /usr don't have to reside on the same partition with the usrmerge proposal: they only have to be both available post-initramfs. The initramfs already takes care to mount /usr (for the systemd case as initscripts needs updates for sysvinit as was said elsewhere). So no repartitioning should be required on upgrades. And the fact that /usr break may require user interaction is not really handled by initramfs and may cause dangling sysmlink in / -- eric |
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Marc Haber
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Jonathan Dowland
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Marc Haber
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Jonathan McDowell
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Marc Haber
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Jonathan McDowell
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Marc Haber
- keyscript (was: Re: support for merged /usr in Debian) Christian Seiler
- Re: keyscript (was: Re: support for merged /usr in Debi... Marc Haber
- Re: keyscript Christian Seiler
- Re: Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Eric Valette
- Re: Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Eric Valette
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Michael Biebl
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Eric Valette
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Iustin Pop
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Adam Borowski
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Michael Biebl
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Andreas Henriksson
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Christian Seiler
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Thorsten Glaser
- Re: support for merged /usr in Debian Christian Seiler