On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 01:29:22PM +0100, Wookey wrote: > +++ Colin Tuckley [2015-09-18 12:22 +0100]: > > We certainly (imho) don't want anything in Debian given that description > > <panto> > > Oh yes we do! > > </panto>
Should we leave this naming to the people actually doing the work to implement this? Alternatively, can we have a GR to amend the constitution to introduce a new elected Debian position of Grand Vizier of Naming and Silliness? -- Schrödinger's backup hypothesis: the condition of any backup is undefined until a restore is attempted. -- andrewsh
