Neil Williams, le Fri 28 Aug 2015 10:32:52 +0100, a écrit : > On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:45:16 +0200 > Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Vincent Bernat, le Fri 28 Aug 2015 10:06:17 +0200, a écrit : > > > Maybe it can be trimmed a bit more, but that's still 239 unique > > > dependencies. > > > > Note that you don't have to make that 239 debian packages, you could > > as well just ship them all in one package, as long as the whole code > > passes NEW, i.e. all their copyrights are fine. > > Depends how many upstreams are involved and therefore how many release > schedules.
As long as we have a set that works, we are fine. Upstream has to have one anyway, we can just take that one. > I still find it hard to believe that *so* much code is required to > minify JS. The excuse that JS is "moving fast" is nonsense. I would rather say "worrying" actually. > Why isn't there a KISS tool to do this? Is it all just special > snowflake optimisations for what has to be / should be a simple process > of removing whitespace and collapsing the formatting? No, it also modifies the code, e.g. turning !foo && !bar into !(foo || bar), which is one character less. I wonder why mere gzip compression is not used. Don't all browsers support Accept-Compress: gzip? Samuel
