On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:34:41PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:09:47PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > FUD is easy. How about documenting yourself on how Safe browsing > > > actually works? Hint: urls are _never_ sent to Google. The worst thing > > > that Google can know is that the _hash_ of /some/ url you went to, has the > > > first n bits matching the first n bits of the hash of one (or multiple) > > > of the known malware of phishing urls. Nothing more. > > > > Why doesn't it just download the full list and do checks client-side? > > The full list is huge, so it downloads a smaller list with hash > prefixes, then when it hits a match, it downloads a list of all the > hashes that start with that prefix.
In other words, that's what it actually does, modulo some optimization so it doesn't have to download terabytes of data. -- It is easy to love a country that is famous for chocolate and beer -- Barack Obama, speaking in Brussels, Belgium, 2014-03-26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150715074242.ga28...@grep.be