I have never really understood the reasons for this discussion. I am not a system administrator ( at least none of a datacenter - just for my home infrastructure, containing 3 machines ), and although I also have a distribution running on one of those ( Arch ) which is using systemd, I never realized any differences. In fact, if nobody ever told me that Arch uses systemd - I wouldn't yet know that.
I am sorry if I reanimate any old discussions right now, but: Can someone tell me the advantages ( and disadvantages ) of systemd ? I'm about to leave Debian as an user - not because of systemd, but because of that discussion. The Debian distribution has actually lost 3 or 4 people. Devs, TC-Members, ... and as I said in my first phrase, I didn't ever understand why this discussion exists at all. Am 25.11.2014 um 17:47 schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > Matthias Urlichs <matthias <at> urlichs.de> writes: > >> Care to tell us why? Other than "ugh, it's written by Lennart"?? > The “why” does not matter. Users do not have to justify why they > need to use something. I worked in for company that had a strict > “no PHP” policy once. I have encountered other more or less weird > scenarios in the “enterprise” (bah, this sounds like a four-letter > word) world about having to use something, or do something, despite > it being nōn-free, while otherwise embracing OSS. (We had a case of > someone wanting to put proprietary software they have to use inside > a .deb so it can be easilier managed and integrated well with Debian > and removed cleanly, recently, on some mailing list.) > > Let me quote: > > 4. Our priorities are our users and free software > We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software > community. We will place their interests first in our priorities. > We will support the needs of our users for operation in many > different kinds of computing environments. We will not object to > non-free works that are intended to be used on Debian systems, or > > So stop this already! > > bye, > //mirabilos > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
