On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:05:13AM +0100, Bj??rn Mork wrote: > m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes: > > On Nov 17, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote: > >> > This is what many still (retorically) wonder about: we the systemd > >> > maintainers did not reject that change, > >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=15;bug=746578 > > Please try to be less selective in your quoting: the issue was still > > being discussed. > I see. So any systemd bug with a 'wontfix' tag is still considered open > for discussion? That's good to know. Thanks.
Isn't any (open) bug tagged wontfix still "open for discussion"? If you've got new information, or a new approach that the maintainer might prefer, you can post it to the bug and discuss it with the maintainer... (That said, I didn't see any discussion in that bug from people listed in the systemd Uploaders line other than Michael Biebl's complaint about a systemd-shim bug two months after the wontfix tag was added. That doesn't *look* like it was "still being discussed" to me. Maybe that just means someone summarising irc/list discussions to the bug would have been helpful) Cheers, aj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141117144829.gb4...@master.debian.org
