On Nov 16, Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> wrote:

> I was really confused that this needed to go to the TC; from what I
> could tell, it had no downside systems using systemd, and it made
> things better on non-systemd systems.  What was the downside of making
> the change, and why did it have to go to the TC instead of the
> maintainer simply accepting the patch?
This is what many still (retorically) wonder about: we the systemd 
maintainers did not reject that change, so it is not clear (or, it is) 
why the TC had to be involved.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: pgpDzcbVxbkvS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to