On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 17:44:11 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> (2014-10-29): > > Would another option be to use "built-using" the doxygen version in > > question. Since effectively this is embedded code from the doxygen > > package if I understand it correctly. Using doxygen to regenerate > > things is the preferred form of modification and all the source is > > available in doxygen. > > > > Other than being annoying and causing stuff to have to be rebuilt when > > doxygen is updated, what's wrong with that? > > AFAICT Built-Using means "keep the source around", not "things have to > be rebuilt when the source is updated".
It does if you want the old source to go away. Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
