Theodore Ts'o writes ("Re: bash exorcism experiment ('bug' 762923 & 763012)"):
> I assume that posh meets the strict definition of 10.4. And so
> without actually changing policy, someone _could_ try setting /bin/sh
> to be /bin/posh, and then start filing RC bugs against packages that
> have scripts that break. Yes?
Why would such bugs be release-critical ?
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/21563.59842.861814.810...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
