On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Steve Langasek wrote: > upstream conflict, but this is just wrong. There is *nothing* unethical > about reusing the library names and sonames when forking. In fact, the
Besides, when changing APIs and breaking interaction with other programs that rely on the original API. You are right when the fork is API compatible (like extension of a library that provides the same API plus something more), but *not* when changing the API. In this case, me too, would consider it *incorrect* (I don't want to use "unethical" as it is difficult to define). Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140801010853.gp29...@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at
