On Jul 29, Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@debian.org> wrote: > security maintenance burden. Nonetheless, libav10 transition is still > not complete in utopic today. I haven't checked, but now abi > compatible/incompatible the two stacks are? cause it would be a pain They really are not, this was explained in detail in the first message.
> if they are not drop in replacements, and it would also be a pain if > higher up packages link-in both ffmpeg & libav and some clashing > symbols are present... This is why the new ffmpeg will use different symbols. Again, read the first message. > and people start requesting to have build variants against both. I don't think so. The harsh reality is that the only people who love libav are the libav maintainers, so I expect that once ffmpeg will be available most maintainers will just switch their packages to it. > Has a rebuild of all deps been done? How many Yes, the data was in the first message. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
