Hi, On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > In [1], Moritz from the security team clearly stated that he is more > than uncomfortable with having more than one copy of libavcodec in > debian/testing. In consequence this means that any package that builds > against the ffmpeg packages currently in NEW won't make it into > testing either. I am therefore surprised about the given answer to the
"More than uncomfortable" does not mean "will not be included" > I think it would be best if ftp-master left the ffmpeg package in NEW > until an answer to this problem has been found. Why, only because libav gets a more powerful and efficient competition? > I am curious why this is your first email about this matter to > pkg-multimedia, and why do you write this email only now? > > Moreover, I am curious why I haven't seen you working on libavcodec > bugs in Debian before, and why do you believe you can do a better job > with the ffmpeg package currently on NEW? As Marco said, why should he fix bugs in av which have been fixed since ages in ffmeg in many (most?) cases? I am all for having a good ffmpeg set of cmd line progs and libs in Debian. It is too long that this sad and useless split was made. Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140728004047.ge2...@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at
