On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 09:23:55AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014, at 08:15, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > There are lots of attack vectors. It's not a response to a single > > > attack being exploited in the wild.
> > So name one? > Pervasive monitoring. Really we should introduce encryption > *everywhere*. If this were DSA's position, I would disagree with it, but I would understand where they're coming from. But DSA has *not* said that this is the reason for enforcing use of a protocol with significantly higher overhead. I do think that if DSA are going to enforce such a policy, they should be able to explain why. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
