* Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> [140717 04:02]: > On 2014-07-17 03:21:28 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > > * Arno Töll <a...@debian.org> [140713 13:25]: > > > * Ignore the problem, and refer to the manpage of aptitude without > > > proper fix etc. which clearly says "THIS OPTION CAN CAUSE DATA LOSS! DO > > > NOT USE IT UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING". The bad news is, we > > > can't tell this before it's too late, such as in a NEWS file - and we > > > know, everybody reads release notes too, right? > > > > I'm expressing support for this, and/or your second option. > > Any non-trivial setup will need config changes anyway, and any sane > > person already uses version control for /etc + config management for > > such setups. > > Actually the problem is not the data loss. The problem is the upgrade > failure.
My understanding was that the new apache binaries would install new config files, and it would then work? (With the correct replaces/breaks/...) -- ,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> : :' : Debian Developer `. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03 `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140717133835.ga47...@sx.intern.ewave.at
