On 13624 March 1977, Svante Signell wrote: >> > Please rename the systemd-must-die package to something neutral. Thank >> > you. >> A package with this name wont ever appear in the archive, and I just >> rejected it. > What about systemd-nogo or nogo-systemd, alternately just no-systemd?
*I* fail to see the good that such a package will bring the archive and Debian. Not just for systemd but in general. It makes so much NOT sense to install a package to not install packages from the same archive. And IMO this is what a local admin should do with equivs, should they decide they don't want a certain set of packages to come in at whatever point later. And should we open the archive for a series of "i hate $tool, i never want it" packages, where do we stop? In theory we could end up with a load of them. no-gnome, no-kde, no-pulseaudio, no-whateverthehellsomeonedislikesnow We currently have some 25k binaries on amd64, plus 20k arch all. We should autogenerate a no-$whatever for all of em, i bet you find someone against any one of them. Maybe except for libs. -- bye, Joerg [http://www.youam.net/stuff/info...-hosting.de/server-info.php] "[...] und der Arbeitsspeicher recht schnell und hoch ist." (Wie hoch? 2cm, 4cm? Am besten an die Decke nageln, was? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
