On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:13:31 +0100 Wookey <woo...@wookware.org> wrote:
> > > You get a choice of 'prevent-systemd' which stops it running as > > > init but allows the -shim and libpam packages so that logind and > > > the like will work. Or 'systemd-must-die' which conflicts with > > > everything systemdish. > > Please rename the systemd-must-die package to something neutral. > > Thank you. > OK. I did rename the source package, but I liked the binary and > thought anyone else who actually wanted this would enjoy it too, so > it seemed appropriate despite not being entirely 'PC'. > > I think some people are failing to see the humour in this name > (and Dawkins knows we could use some humour round this subject), but I > guess if it's not going to be allowed then it's not going to be > allowed. I'm sure you have heard about the amount of headache one joke of Douglas Crockford with its "JSLint license" provoked [1]. Humour is a wonderful thing (and while not being a systemd hater myself, I did appreciate the pick of the original package's name) but it has its limits of applicability. The official Debian software archive sets such limits--as simple as that. 1. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#JSON -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140702135608.11f0a8aa94f2c2db031ac...@domain007.com
