On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:01 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 06/25/2014 03:59 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > > You are insinuating that people are surreptitiously adding dependencies > > on systemd components their packages don’t need, just so that they get > > installed on your system to piss you off. > > No. It's probably not intentional. But the effect is the same. > > I used the word "Insidious" as I would have use "Stealth", because it's > happening slowly, without us noticing, that everything in Debian is > being locked with systemd. Soon, we'll have no choice.
Agreed, maybe we should increase #747535 to RC level again? Perhaps this is something for the CTTE to consider. > On 06/25/2014 04:01 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > We have decided to use systemd as the default. > > Yes. And *only* about the default. Not that systemd should be mandatory. This is the essence of this issue: Default but not mandatory. Regarding mate desktop policykit-1 build-depends on libsystemd-login-dev only for linux-any. What functionality is missing for other architectures? What about libselinux for policykit-1, this dependency is also linux-any. Regarding the comment on systemd-must-die, it was mainly for people who *dont* want systemd on their computers, I'm not alone here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1403707438.14272.33.ca...@s1499.it.kth.se
