On Tue, 13 May 2014 11:44:13 +0200, Matthias Urlichs <matth...@urlichs.de> wrote: >It's also demonstrably false. Otherwise systemd would not be compatible >with existing SysV init scripts (to the point that I can run them manually >and, if they happen to load the LSB stuff, they transparently redirect >themselves through systemd), systemd would not forward to rsyslog, …
Systemd upstream is doing the bare minimum to make systemd appear as if it would interface to "legacy technology" since they know that noone would migrate to their product if they didn't make the impression of being compatible. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wkd03-0004xo...@swivel.zugschlus.de
