Hi, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez: > "[...] they don't want you to have the option of NOT using their stuff. > """ http://www.landley.net/notes.html#23-04-2014 > IMHO this is a gross mis-characterization.
A whole lot more correct IMHO would be the idea that their developer time is best spent fixing the bugs / anachronisms / take-your-pick in other packages so that they work with systemd, instead of implementing soon-to- be-obsolete and nontrivial-to-maintain workarounds within systemd. It's also demonstrably false. Otherwise systemd would not be compatible with existing SysV init scripts (to the point that I can run them manually and, if they happen to load the LSB stuff, they transparently redirect themselves through systemd), systemd would not forward to rsyslog, … -- -- Matthias Urlichs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140513094413.gh13...@smurf.noris.de
