On Thu, 08 May 2014, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Wed, 7 May 2014, Bálint Réczey wrote: > > In my interpretation in this case I would have some reasonable time > > to comply, i.e. I don't have to publish all 0days on my site if I > > run AGPL-covered software..
You only have to publish code to users who are interacting with that code. If you're deploying 0 day fixes to the internet, then you're going to have to provide access to the same code so that other people can take advantage of your fixes. > On Wed, 7 May 2014, Clint Byrum wrote: > > The things that link to ghostscript as a library will now need to be > > evaluated. If they are contacted via network ports, they'll need to > > have source download capabilities added. This is incorrect. They only need to have this in place if they modify the AGPLed work. > On Thu, 8 May 2014, Riley Baird wrote: > > What if the network in question is not the internet? > > Right, the AGPL is not technology-neutral. The AGPL just specifies "computer network" and "network server". It says nothing about the internet at all. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com "Because," Fee-5 explained patiently, "I was born in the fifth row. Any fool would understand that, but against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain." -- Alfred Bester _The Computer Connection_ p19 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140508190608.gh13...@teltox.donarmstrong.com
