On Wed, 7 May 2014, Ian Jackson wrote: > Yes. But this isn't as bad as you think, because the source > availability requirement exists only if you modify the AGPL'd > software.
Which you may want to do, in order to patch a security issue you just found, locally, before filing it upstream. Or because you’re a user of Debian and used to be able to do just that. This basically fails “Licence must not be specific to Debian” if you assume the “did not modify so this clause does not apply” case. bye, //mirabilos -- [16:04:33] bkix: "veni vidi violini" [16:04:45] bkix: "ich kam, sah und vergeigte"... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.10.1405071436050.23...@tglase.lan.tarent.de
