Distributing pornography in academic network in Taiwan seems like a gray area. http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/EngLawContent.aspx?Type=E&id=2
If it can be distributed from a separate repo it should be fine, but I also wonder how many mirrors are under the place where pornography is not allowed to distribute. On Mar 25, 2014 4:51 AM, "Mathieu Malaterre" <mathieu.malate...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/24/14, Joerg Jaspert <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > [...] > > So instead, we have a simple set of questions that should be applied, > > helping to judge contents before upload: > > > > - Is it likely illegal in the majority of the countries of our > > Developers? > > > > - Will it harm Debian, our mirrors, derivatives or users and > > potentially endanger them or require extra work on their side to > > protect them from such? > > > > If you can answer these questions with a yes or even a maybe - don't > > While I did agree mostly with this. I believe the last sentence should > be reworded. Because aircrack-ng, crack or rarcrack could 'maybe' harm > Debian/mirrors or derivatives. > > 'maybe' feels like too broad. > > 2cts > -- > Mathieu > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/CA+7wUsxo21R774i=xvF07Ftwpuh=9_rpt3eno01glqauybq...@mail.gmail.com > >
