On 19 February 2014 16:05, Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014, at 16:57, The Wanderer wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> On 02/19/2014 10:45 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> >> > On 19 February 2014 15:28, Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> wrote: >> > >> >> Dimitri, >> >> >> are you aware that media are already quoting your blogpost as >> >> official announcement of next Debian codename? >> > >> > Nah, wasn't aware =) I blame Neil, I thought he still was a release >> > manager ;-) Any reason, not to make it official? =) > > And obviously the phoronix and others thought you are on the release > team and you have a say about next codename (since you have blogged > about it, it must be true). *palmface* (not targeted at Neil nor > Dimitri...) > >> Well, back in 2002 there was a probably-joking sort-of decision that >> "zurg" should be the codename of the release where the Hurd and *BSD >> ports were fully ready [1]. Given that we seem to be moving more towards >> dropping ports than finalizing them at the moment, using the name zurg >> would not seem to be in keeping with that idea. >> >> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/07/msg01139.html >> >> I like the idea (and the method of choosing, and of announcing, it) >> otherwise, though. > > Well, it makes me really sad how little effort the current journalists > make to verify the claims. Dimitry blogs some insider joke and it's > already on phoronix. And since it's written on the internet it must be > true. *double palmface* >
Wait, wait, somebody needs to edit Debian's wikipedia article with citations, for it to be _triple_ official and verified =))))))) -- Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANBHLUgNmZbhrW1_RY=f+6nabx-vcpj+-qf5kid2rtqisvi...@mail.gmail.com
