Le mercredi, 19 février 2014, 00.56:07 Thomas Goirand a écrit : > On 02/18/2014 11:10 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:55:32PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Once I consider OpenRC ready for it, would it be ok to just replace > >> sysv-rc by OpenRC, and transform sysv-rc into a transitional > >> package? > >> What is the opinion of other DDs? Is there anyone which would like > >> to > >> keep the old featureless sysv-rc? > > > > What problem does that solve? > > In this way, we'd have only 2 init systems to take care of, and we > could start replacing init.d scripts by OpenRC runscripts *IF* > there's a systemd service file.
Yes. And three different daemon-starting syntaxes to manage the Wheezy- to-Jessie upgrades. Again, for Jessie, I don't think it's reasonable to change the default init _and_ replace the common baseline. I, for one, am not going to replace my awkward-but-working sysvinit scripts by anything but systemd/upstart unit files and that is doomed to happen in jessie+1 [0]. Cheers, OdyX [0] Can we haz a release name? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2536787.IXIK3uYTH8@gyllingar
