On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev ->
> > liblcms2-dev)
> > The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm going ahead. Below is a dd-list of
> > affected packages.
> > This is a headsup as recommended by policy, I'll file bugs in a few weeks.
>
> Could you note that lcms2 have some ABI problem, and it seems we
> should do a transition in newer version. See
> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/lcms.html
> and #701993.
>
> So maybe we should made directly the transition to the new ABI ?
Sorry for the late reply. I wouldn't hold my breath for the transition
to the new ABI, so moving from lcms1 to lcms2 is probably more important
for now.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140209012146.GC9518@pisco.westfalen.local
