On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:37:35PM +0000, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > Of course they do even if the couple of people possibly concerned with > it that I know use.. is it Citrix? I was merely pointing out that it > is an extremely small minority of Debian users but possibly? a majority
Do you have any references to back up how you know this? Or just merely guessing? It seems like pure guesswork. > This should be considered in weighting the pros and cons that's all > especially when terms like real features (largely gone undefined) are > being banded around. As I have said issues that affect many and people > may actually notice have gone are easily fixed as far as I am aware > (certainly the ones mentioned like suspend, as I do so when disabling > polkit very easily without compilation). So how many debian Gnome users > will notice the breakage aside from suspend and ? how many will > continue to use Gnome if the default is changed as has already been > raised. Are you taking up ConsoleKit development or not? Loads of things could theoretically maybe be done. What matters is something concrete. > On top of that, large organisation's should have no problem solving > this and do they use debian or want support from Red Hat/Citrix in > most cases? Please don't turn this into a Canonical vs Red Hat thread. > I don't need the dbus system bus personally either but I understand the > vast vast majority do in current setups, so that is a real issue of the > future if permitted to land into the kernel as the only option (I doubt > it) and as Canonical/Ubuntu and Google have concerns on multiple fronts > here I think it is certainly worth waiting that out and should not > really be used as an argument currently. GNOME relies on d-bus for various things. Not liking d-bus doesn't change that fact. -- Regards, Olav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131029190755.ge25...@bkor.dhs.org
