On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 11:46 +1100, Brian May wrote: > On 24 October 2013 11:09, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > * it breaks other users of cgroups. I have not tested this > personally > > (mostly because of the above point), but if I understand it > right, it takes > over the whole cgroups system, requiring anything that runs on > the same > kernel instance to beg it via dbus to perform required > actions. > > > I have heard this said before, would like to have some official > confirmation if this is actually the case or not. cgroups are > currently hierarchical,
Sort of. > I would have thought this would mean, at least in theory, different > programs could be responsible for different parts of the hierarchy. Yes, but there isn't a protocol for delegating that responsibility. > If it is true, it is the thing we need to be prepared for, and so far > I haven't seen any official information. > > > This might also be relevant > here: > http://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/733595-all-about-the-linux-kernel-cgroups-redesign This change is still under discussion. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1382610937.6315.65.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk
